|
Details: WootHosting: $19/year/2GB memory/50GB space/2TB traffic/OpenVZ/Los Angeles/Miami/New York The so-called CLOUD RESOURCE POOL is a big hen. You can open multiple chicks. This $30 model can open 4. You can choose Los Angeles, New York, or Miami data centers, or just build one. It has strong configuration. From this perspective, it is actually quite good.
Comprehensively judging from the three models tested, Los Angeles is the best, followed by New York, and Miami is not recommended. 1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz Number of cores : 4 CPU frequency : 2666.704 MHz Total size of Disk : 100.0 GB (0.8 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 4096 MB (16 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 1 hour 14 min Load average : 0.00, 2.61, 4.34 OS : CentOS 7.2.1511 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab124.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 1.2 GB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 1.2 GB/s Average I/O speed : 1228.8 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 55.0MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 12.0MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 4.30MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 10.2MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 8.89MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 1.85MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 40.5MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 3.95MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 9.45MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 6.47MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 6.86MB/s 2. Upload/download bandwidth test Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Mimosa Networks (Fremont, CA) [14.34 km]: 88.15 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 186.65 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 96.01 Mbit/s 3. Domestic access speed
4. Hard disk I/O performance test dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0.227576 s, 1.2 GB/s 5. UnixBench Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 28 2017 10:01:49 - 10:29:57 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26442235.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3437.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2792.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 594160.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 163285.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1375485.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1267542.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 114646.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 5297.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5698.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1920.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1692687.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26442235.1 2265.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3437.0 624.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 2792.6 649.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 594160.3 1500.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 163285.7 986.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1375485.5 2371.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1267542.1 1018.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 114646.5 286.6 Process Creation 126.0 5297.9 420.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5698.7 1344.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1920.4 3200.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1692687.4 1128.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1056.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 28 2017 10:29:57 - 10:58:07 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 104764575.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 13712.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 13645.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 620945.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 171701.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1740323.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 4939539.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 784553.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 23473.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16783.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2392.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4883326.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 104764575.7 8977.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 13712.4 2493.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 13645.6 3173.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 620945.4 1568.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 171701.4 1037.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1740323.3 3000.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4939539.8 3970.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 784553.5 1961.4 Process Creation 126.0 23473.6 1863.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16783.7 3958.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2392.4 3987.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4883326.6 3255.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2825.1 6. Packet loss test Ping from 192.168.103.55 to 23.95.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 12/29 00:15:31.558 Ping to 23.95.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 12/29 00:15:31.876 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=316ms TTL=46, ave=316.00ms 12/29 00:15:32.873 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=322ms TTL=46, ave=319.00ms 12/29 00:15:33.845 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=294ms TTL=46, ave=310.67ms 12/29 00:15:34.876 PingMax #4 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=324ms TTL=46, ave=314.00ms 12/29 00:15:36.875 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=327ms TTL=46, ave=317.83ms 12/29 00:15:48.845 PingMin #18 Reply 32 bytes from 23.95.xxx.xxx: time=292ms TTL=46, ave=311.56ms 12/29 00:15:50.870 === 20 有效發送, 20 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 311.85ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2017/12/29 00:15:31經過時間: 000:00:19結束時間: 2017/12/29 00:15:50 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送20 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值292ms, 最大值327ms, 平均值311.85ms 7. Route tracking <br /> Telecommunications
China Unicom
move
|
