OVH 1GB RAM SSD Hard Drive Singapore KVM VPS Review

OVH 1GB RAM SSD Hard Drive Singapore KVM VPS Review

Details: OVH: $2.5/month/1GB RAM/30GB SSD space/1TB traffic/DDOS/KVM/Singapore/Australia
2018.6.27: OVH Singapore's hosting has good performance, but the network packet loss is terrible. . . I've never seen anything like this. Only recommended for those who need DDOS protection!
Update 2018.7.10: It seems that OVH has officially adjusted the routing. Then we added Ruisu, which significantly improved both YouTube speed and packet loss.
Welcome to the TeleGram group discussion : https://t.me/zhujiwiki

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 CPU Model : Intel Core Processor (Broadwell) CPU Cores : 1 Cores @ 3504.000 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 4096 KB OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel : 3.16.0-6-amd64 Total Space : 30.0 GB (1.0 GB Used) Total RAM : 976 MB (271 MB Used 16 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 0 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime : 0 days 1 hour 53 min Load average : 0.50, 0.13, 0.04 ASN & ISP : AS16276, OVH Organization : OVH SAS Location : Singapore, Singapore / SG Region : Central Singapore Community Development Council ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 362 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 374 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 374 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 370.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 99.13 Mbit/s 97.30 Mbit/s 1.662 ms Shanghai CT 1.44 Mbit/s 0.65 Mbit/s 484.434 ms Kunming CT 6.84 Mbit/s 1.05 Mbit/s 342.028 ms Shanghai CU 3.52 Mbit/s 2.68 Mbit/s 293.231 ms Xi'an CU 6.41 Mbit/s 2.23 Mbit/s 366.403 ms Chongqing CU 5.31 Mbit/s 3.73 Mbit/s 401.401 ms Xi'an CM 21.88 Mbit/s 51.62 Mbit/s 406.346 ms Chengdu CM 22.98 Mbit/s 20.54 Mbit/s 319.791 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 3 min 42 sec Timestamp : 2018-06-27 16:55:54 GMT+8

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

 Testing from OVH (139.99.47.129)... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Viewqwest Pte Ltd (Singapore) [6.25 km]: 1.591 ms Testing download speed................................... Download: 97.32 Mbit/s Testing upload speed.....................................

3. Domestic access speed

Updated on July 10, 2018 :

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 6.34936 s, 42.3 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Wed Jun 27 2018 10:57:36 - 11:25:42 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38894235.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4704.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 6709.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 745327.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 202362.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2033337.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1139729.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 217096.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 17285.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10340.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1306.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1203056.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38894235.7 3332.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4704.7 855.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 6709.4 1560.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 745327.0 1882.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 202362.8 1222.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2033337.5 3505.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1139729.4 916.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 217096.3 542.7 Process Creation 126.0 17285.2 1371.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10340.4 2438.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1306.5 2177.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1203056.9 802.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1472.9

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 10.0.0.20 to 139.99.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 06/27 16:50:20.541 Ping to 139.99.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/27 16:50:21.254 超時#1 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:21.860 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=320ms TTL=45, ave=320.00ms 06/27 16:50:23.254 超時#3 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:24.255 超時#4 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:24.859 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=321ms TTL=45, ave=320.50ms 06/27 16:50:25.855 PingMin #6 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=318ms TTL=45, ave=319.67ms 06/27 16:50:27.254 超時#7 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:28.255 超時#8 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:29.255 超時#9 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:30.254 超時#10 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:31.254 超時#11 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:31.858 PingMin #12 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=317ms TTL=45, ave=319.00ms 06/27 16:50:37.255 超時#17 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:41.255 超時#21 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:46.254 超時#26 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:47.254 超時#27 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:48.254 超時#28 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:49.254 超時#29 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:50.254 超時#30 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:52.255 超時#32 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:53.254 超時#33 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:55.255 超時#35 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:56.254 超時#36 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:57.255 超時#37 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:50:57.864 PingMax #38 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=324ms TTL=45, ave=319.67ms 06/27 16:50:59.255 超時#39 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:01.255 超時#41 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:03.254 超時#43 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:05.255 超時#45 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:06.254 超時#46 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:07.254 超時#47 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:08.255 超時#48 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:09.254 超時#49 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:11.255 超時#51 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:13.255 超時#53 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:16.254 超時#56 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:16.858 PingMin #57 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=316ms TTL=45, ave=319.65ms 06/27 16:51:18.255 超時#58 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:21.255 超時#61 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:22.254 超時#62 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:23.254 超時#63 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:24.255 超時#64 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:26.255 超時#66 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:27.254 超時#67 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:29.254 超時#69 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:31.254 超時#71 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:33.254 超時#73 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:34.254 超時#74 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:36.254 超時#76 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:37.254 超時#77 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:38.255 超時#78 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:39.254 超時#79 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:42.255 超時#82 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:43.255 超時#83 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:47.255 超時#87 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:48.254 超時#88 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:54.254 超時#94 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:56.255 超時#96 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:51:58.254 超時#98 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:52:00.254 超時#100 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/27 16:52:00.254 === 100 有效發送, 46 接收, 54.00% 丟失, 319.52ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/06/27 16:50:20經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/06/27 16:52:00 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送46 有效接收54 timed out (54.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值316ms, 最大值324ms, 平均值319.52ms

Updated on July 10, 2018 :

 Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 139.99.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 07/10 08:44:33.493 Ping to 139.99.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 07/10 08:44:33.784 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=296ms TTL=44, ave=296.00ms 07/10 08:44:34.739 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=260ms TTL=44, ave=278.00ms 07/10 08:44:37.754 PingMin #5 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=257ms TTL=44, ave=275.40ms 07/10 08:44:49.741 PingMin #17 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=247ms TTL=44, ave=271.94ms 07/10 08:44:53.812 PingMax #21 Reply 32 bytes from 139.99.xxx.xxx: time=309ms TTL=44, ave=273.86ms 07/10 08:46:12.773 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 276.44ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/07/10 08:44:33經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/07/10 08:46:12 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值247ms, 最大值309ms, 平均值276.44ms

7. Route tracking <br /> Telecommunications

China Unicom

move

Updated on July 10, 2018 :
telecommunications

China Unicom

move


8. YouTube speed test
Updated on July 10, 2018 :

<<:  Hetzner: €54/month/E3-1275v5/64GB memory/2x512GB NVME hard disk/30TB bandwidth/Germany/Finland

>>:  SupremeVPS: $14/year/1.5G memory/20GB SSD space/2TB traffic/OpenVZ/Los Angeles CC

Recommend

wishosting: $3.99/month/2GB memory/12GB SSD space/1TB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles

Wishosting, the reviews are pretty good, I have i...

UK hosting provider Host1Plus announces support for Alipay

After Godaddy, IXwebhosting, and Hostease announc...

bandwagonhost 512MB Phoenix Simple Review

VPS details: bandwagonhost: $9.99/year/1 CPU/512M...

Canadian Hosting Provider - MyHosting Hosting Introduction

1. Introduction to MyHosting MyHosting was founde...

Liufei - A software that can solve the problem of accessing IPv6 websites

Generally, people who surf the Internet know that...

Install Kloxo-MR host web panel on CentOS

Kloxo-MR is a lightweight and open source host pa...

DigitalOcean Free $60 Offer

Visit: https://www.digitalocean.com/promos/campai...