vpsho 2GB RAM SSD hard drive Los Angeles KVM VPS review

Opened by a big shot in the QQ group, only for use within the group (QQ group: 332991659), no oversale. It is said that the IP is native to the United States.
Configuration and price: 4 cores/2GB memory/50GB SSD space/1TB traffic/1Gbps bandwidth/KVM/Los Angeles, 45 yuan/month

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 4 CPU frequency : 3600.018 MHz Total size of Disk : 8.9 GB (0.9 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 1876 MB (223 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 1027 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 0 hour 4 min Load average : 0.30, 0.08, 0.02 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-696.30.1.el6.x86_64 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 222 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 169 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 279 MB/s Average I/O speed : 223.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 154.39 Mbit/s 431.91 Mbit/s 1.387 ms Xiangyang CT 24.60 Mbit/s 48.34 Mbit/s 318.593 ms Shanghai CT 18.83 Mbit/s 66.00 Mbit/s 287.221 ms Chengdu CT 21.05 Mbit/s 46.91 Mbit/s 340.342 ms Xi'an CU 6.30 Mbit/s 30.68 Mbit/s 249.029 ms Shanghai CU 18.22 Mbit/s 4.69 Mbit/s 260.443 ms Chongqing CU 17.53 Mbit/s 39.50 Mbit/s 774.498 ms Xi'an CM 34.39 Mbit/s 63.47 Mbit/s 200.868 ms Shanghai CM 55.58 Mbit/s 12.62 Mbit/s 189.937 ms Chengdu CM 11.50 Mbit/s 14.70 Mbit/s 306.549 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 4 min 2 sec Current time : 2018-06-05 15:22:21 Finished！

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by WebNX (Los Angeles, CA) [2.74 km]: 5.777 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 752.87 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 305.50 Mbit/s

3. Domestic access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 70.792 s, 3.8 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Tue Jun 05 2018 16:11:21 - 16:39:45 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 41715990.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4497.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4877.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1309991.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 366113.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2849630.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2489014.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 462076.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 12373.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9106.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3337.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3271424.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 41715990.9 3574.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4497.3 817.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 4877.6 1134.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1309991.5 3308.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 366113.0 2212.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2849630.2 4913.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2489014.9 2000.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 462076.5 1155.2 Process Creation 126.0 12373.0 982.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9106.5 2147.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3337.5 5562.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3271424.8 2180.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2092.6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Jun 05 2018 16:39:45 - 17:08:01 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 164192419.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 17887.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 23881.6 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1348636.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 363421.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3870099.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 9661735.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1564031.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 69024.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 28439.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3687.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 9605377.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 164192419.9 14069.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 17887.8 3252.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 23881.6 5553.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1348636.6 3405.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 363421.1 2195.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3870099.9 6672.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 9661735.8 7766.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1564031.3 3910.1 Process Creation 126.0 69024.8 5478.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 28439.5 6707.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3687.9 6146.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 9605377.8 6403.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 5355.8

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 52.119.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 06/06 10:47:06.335 Ping to 52.119.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/06 10:47:06.594 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 52.119.xxx.xxx: time=252ms TTL=48, ave=252.00ms 06/06 10:47:07.586 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 52.119.xxx.xxx: time=256ms TTL=48, ave=254.00ms 06/06 10:47:08.591 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 52.119.xxx.xxx: time=258ms TTL=48, ave=255.33ms 06/06 10:47:09.569 PingMin #4 Reply 32 bytes from 52.119.xxx.xxx: time=240ms TTL=48, ave=251.50ms 06/06 10:47:10.612 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 52.119.xxx.xxx: time=281ms TTL=48, ave=257.40ms 06/06 10:47:15.565 PingMin #10 Reply 32 bytes from 52.119.xxx.xxx: time=237ms TTL=48, ave=250.80ms 06/06 10:47:19.565 PingMin #14 Reply 32 bytes from 52.119.xxx.xxx: time=233ms TTL=48, ave=248.64ms 06/06 10:47:20.555 PingMin #15 Reply 32 bytes from 52.119.xxx.xxx: time=225ms TTL=48, ave=247.07ms 06/06 10:47:27.541 PingMin #22 Reply 32 bytes from 52.119.xxx.xxx: time=215ms TTL=48, ave=241.77ms 06/06 10:47:29.681 PingMax #24 Reply 32 bytes from 52.119.xxx.xxx: time=351ms TTL=48, ave=245.92ms 06/06 10:48:45.574 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 242.71ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/06/06 10:47:06經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/06/06 10:48:45 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值215ms, 最大值351ms, 平均值242.71ms

7. Route tracking <br />Telecommunications

China Unicom

move

8. YouTube speed test