|
Details: Tospeed: 20 yuan/month/512MB memory/10GB SSD space/3TB traffic/KVM/Novosibirsk
The KVM VPS with SSD hard disk has very good network, performance, and I/O. If it can operate long-term and stably, it is worth buying. 1. System information and bandwidth test CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 4200.028 MHz Total size of Disk : 9.4 GB (1.2 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 490 MB (337 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 13 hour 53 min Load average : 0.54, 0.16, 0.05 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-696.23.1.el6.x86_64 ip : 185.135.xxx.xxx ipaddr : 俄羅斯新西伯利亞州新西伯利亞adman.com vm : kvm Node Name: IPv4 address: Download Speed CacheFly: 205.234.175.175: 12.71 MiB/s | 101.68 Mbps Linode, Tokyo, JP: 106.187.96.148: 11.64 MiB/s | 93.13 Mbps Linode, Tokyo2, JP: 139.162.65.37: 2.68 MiB/s | 21.43 Mbps Linode, Singapore, SG: 139.162.23.4: 2.13 MiB/s | 17.01 Mbps Linode, Fremont, CA: 50.116.14.9: 709.42 KiB/s | 5.54 Mbps Linode, Newark, NJ: 50.116.57.237: 5.57 MiB/s | 44.54 Mbps Linode, London, UK: 176.58.107.39: 10.88 MiB/s | 87.03 Mbps Linode, Frankfurt, DE: 139.162.130.8: 11.39 MiB/s | 91.15 Mbps Softlayer, Tokyo, JP: 161.202.125.20: 1.53 MiB/s | 12.21 Mbps Softlayer, Singapore, SG: 119.81.28.170: 2.96 MiB/s | 23.69 Mbps Softlayer, Seoul, KR: 119.81.28.170: 2.87 MiB/s | 22.93 Mbps Softlayer, HongKong, CN: 119.81.130.170: 4.00 MiB/s | 31.99 Mbps Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 169.48.124.82: 2.20 MiB/s | 17.57 Mbps Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 67.228.112.250: 2.20 MiB/s | 17.58 Mbps Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE: 159.122.69.4: 9.64 MiB/s | 77.10 Mbps Softlayer, Paris, FR: 159.8.64.212: 8.78 MiB/s | 70.22 Mbps Leaseweb, HongKong, CN: 43.249.36.49: 3.48 MiB/s | 27.87 Mbps Leaseweb, Singapore, SG: 103.254.153.18: 5.93 MiB/s | 47.42 Mbps Leaseweb, Washington DC, US: 207.244.94.80: 5.54 MiB/s | 44.29 Mbps Leaseweb, San Francisco, US: 209.58.135.187: 2.22 MiB/s | 17.78 Mbps Leaseweb, Netherlands, NL: 5.79.108.33: 6.40 MiB/s | 51.16 Mbps OVH, Montreal, CA: 192.99.19.165: 3.27 MiB/s | 26.13 Mbps ChinaTelecom, Shanghai, CN: 101.95.48.41: 830.66 KiB/s | 6.49 Mbps ChinaTelecom, Beijing, CN: 60.247.96.2: 1.08 MiB/s | 8.62 Mbps ChinaUnicom, Beijing, CN: 61.135.202.2: 5.43 MiB/s | 43.46 Mbps ChinaTelecom, Guangzhou, CN: 119.145.88.166: 4.21 MiB/s | 33.68 Mbps ChinaMobile, Guangzhou, CN: 221.179.46.222: 204.45 KiB/s | 1.60 Mbps ChinaTelecom, Hefei, CN: 61.191.111.11: 7.41 MiB/s | 59.30 Mbps ChinaUnicom, Hefei, CN: 112.122.10.26: 8.67 MiB/s | 69.35 Mbps ChinaMobile, Hefei, CN: 120.209.140.60: 2.30 MiB/s | 18.42 Mbps Hinet, Taiwan, TW: 210.61.132.1: 4.26 MiB/s | 34.09 Mbps 2. Upload/download bandwidth test Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Akado Telecom (Moscow) [0.15 km]: 81.515 ms Testing download speed.......................................... Download: 242.40 Mbit/s Testing upload speed............................................ Upload: 173.45 Mbit/s 3. Domestic access speed
4. Hard disk I/O performance test ioping: seek rate min/avg/max/mdev = 22.5 us / 51.6 us / 14.0 ms / 175.3 us ioping: sequential speed generated 12.0 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.92 GiB, 2.39 k iops, 598.3 MiB/s 5. UnixBench Benchmark Run: Tue May 15 2018 11:36:57 - 12:05:21 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 48080249.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4095.9 MWIPS (11.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4606.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 428998.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 117549.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1296243.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 656128.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 175828.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 14132.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5584.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 755.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 649009.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 48080249.7 4120.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4095.9 744.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 4606.9 1071.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 428998.3 1083.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 117549.4 710.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1296243.0 2234.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 656128.9 527.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 175828.0 439.6 Process Creation 126.0 14132.0 1121.6 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5584.0 1317.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 755.4 1259.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 649009.0 432.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1004.4 6. Packet loss test Ping from 192.168.16.243 to 185.135.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 05/15 11:38:47.541 Ping to 185.135.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 05/15 11:38:47.669 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=121ms TTL=52, ave=121.00ms 05/15 11:38:48.667 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=119ms TTL=52, ave=120.00ms 05/15 11:39:01.671 PingMax #15 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=124ms TTL=52, ave=119.60ms 05/15 11:39:08.663 PingMin #22 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=118ms TTL=52, ave=119.55ms 05/15 11:39:09.672 PingMax #23 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=130ms TTL=52, ave=120.00ms 05/15 11:40:06.681 PingMax #80 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=137ms TTL=52, ave=119.96ms 05/15 11:40:25.683 PingMax #99 Reply 32 bytes from 185.135.xxx.xxx: time=138ms TTL=52, ave=120.06ms 05/15 11:40:26.674 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 120.06ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/05/15 11:38:47經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/05/15 11:40:26 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值118ms, 最大值138ms, 平均值120.06ms 7. Route tracking <br /> Telecommunications
China Unicom
move
8. YouTube speed test
|
