WootHosting 2GB RAM Chicago KVM VPS Review

WootHosting 2GB RAM Chicago KVM VPS Review

Details: WootHosting: $18/year/1GB memory/30GB space/3TB traffic/KVM/Chicago/New York/Los Angeles
WootHosting Chicago VPS is hosted in the servercentral.com data center (actually still cc), and the domestic speed is pretty good.
For low-priced VPS merchants like this, it is generally recommended to choose less popular ones such as the East Coast of the United States, where the ping rate is not good but the speed is fast, and avoid crowding the West Coast of the United States (where the ping rate is good but the speed is slow).

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 2 CPU frequency : 2400.084 MHz Total size of Disk : 48.0 GB (0.9 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 2010 MB (238 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 2047 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 0 hour 4 min Load average : 0.19, 0.15, 0.06 OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.16.0-4-amd64 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 241 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 77.4 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 115 MB/s Average I/O speed : 144.5 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 64.72 Mbit/s 78.41 Mbit/s 23.638 ms Xiangyang CT 19.37 Mbit/s 20.32 Mbit/s 380.134 ms Chengdu CT 30.30 Mbit/s 28.18 Mbit/s 254.232 ms Xi'an CU 27.91 Mbit/s 12.31 Mbit/s 359.396 ms Shanghai CU 21.08 Mbit/s 5.27 Mbit/s 247.509 ms Chongqing CU 17.10 Mbit/s 10.22 Mbit/s 315.358 ms Xi'an CM 30.44 Mbit/s 16.28 Mbit/s 278.109 ms Shanghai CM 17.25 Mbit/s 9.34 Mbit/s 241.113 ms Chengdu CM 22.84 Mbit/s 11.36 Mbit/s 278.677 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 4 min 22 sec Current time : 2018-04-22 18:53:27 Finished!

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by InnSys Inc (Toronto, ON) [94.56 km]: 22.524 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 80.66 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 102.42 Mbit/s

3. Domestic access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 7.59933 s, 35.3 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 22 2018 19:06:56 - 19:34:58 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19543082.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2777.7 MWIPS (9.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 836.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 540167.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 159496.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1095607.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1346548.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 186406.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 2816.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3471.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 969.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2777460.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19543082.5 1674.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2777.7 505.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 836.7 194.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 540167.4 1364.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 159496.8 963.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1095607.6 1889.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1346548.4 1082.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 186406.3 466.0 Process Creation 126.0 2816.7 223.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3471.7 818.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 969.0 1615.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2777460.4 1851.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 833.8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sun Apr 22 2018 19:34:58 - 20:03:08 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 35504731.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 5405.3 MWIPS (9.6 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4961.6 lps (29.5 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 753528.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 187342.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1762778.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2547226.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 348665.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8736.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6675.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1189.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4262132.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 35504731.5 3042.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5405.3 982.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 4961.6 1153.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 753528.5 1902.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 187342.6 1132.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1762778.9 3039.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2547226.7 2047.6 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 348665.4 871.7 Process Creation 126.0 8736.6 693.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6675.8 1574.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1189.7 1982.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4262132.3 2841.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1583.2

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 75.102.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 04/23 09:01:40.380 Ping to 75.102.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 04/23 09:01:40.621 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=237ms TTL=43, ave=237.00ms 04/23 09:01:41.634 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=250ms TTL=43, ave=243.50ms 04/23 09:01:45.642 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=261ms TTL=43, ave=245.33ms 04/23 09:01:46.619 PingMin #7 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=236ms TTL=43, ave=244.00ms 04/23 09:01:48.682 PingMax #9 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=300ms TTL=43, ave=249.33ms 04/23 09:02:11.619 PingMin #32 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=235ms TTL=43, ave=246.03ms 04/23 09:02:51.890 PingMax #72 Reply 32 bytes from 75.102.xxx.xxx: time=506ms TTL=43, ave=249.53ms 04/23 09:03:19.621 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 250.78ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/04/23 09:01:40經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/04/23 09:03:19 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值235ms, 最大值506ms, 平均值250.78ms

7. Route tracking <br /> Telecommunications

China Unicom

8. YouTube speed test

<<:  TechVPS: $9/year/512MB RAM/10GB space/1TB bandwidth/KVM/Psychz, Los Angeles

>>:  DeinServerHost: €2.95/month/1GB RAM/20GB SSD space/1TB traffic/DDOS/OpenVZ/Germany

Recommend

$3.85/month/unlimited space/unlimited traffic virtual hosting - TMDHosting

TMDHosting has been providing hosting services si...

Under Linux system, one-click network reinstallation system is Centos7

Originated from cxthhhhh.com. Only works with KVM...

QuadHost: £16/year/128MB/10GB space/250GB traffic/OpenVZ/UK/NF available

QuadHost, a business with good stability, now has...

[Black Friday] OVH/Soyoustart: Dedicated Servers and VPS Discounts

Some of them have good value for money, especiall...

EndOffice: $29/month/8GB memory/500GB space/12TB traffic/1 IP/Washington

EndOffice, an American hosting company, was found...

.com domain € 2,90/first year Register.it

Register.it is offering a discount on .com domain...

CenTex Hosting: $5/month/4GB RAM/300GB storage/4TB bandwidth/OpenVZ/Los Angeles

CenTex Hosting, an American hosting company, was ...