BandwagonHost 512MB RAM Los Angeles QNET KVM VPS Review

Details: BandwagonHost: $19.99/year/512MB memory/10GB SSD space/500GB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles, data center can be changed.
Or BandwagonHost: $19.99/year/512MB memory/10GB SSD space/1TB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles, the data center cannot be changed, but the traffic is doubled and the price is lowered.

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 System Info ----------- Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) CPU Cores : 1 Frequency : 3600.000 MHz Memory : 507 MB Swap : 0 MB Uptime : 1 min, OS : CentOS release 6.9 (Final) Arch : i686 (32 Bit) Kernel : 4.11.6-1.el6.elrepo.i686 Hostname : localhost.localdomain Speedtest (IPv4 only) --------------------- Your public IPv4 is 67.209.xxx.xxx Location Provider Speed CDN Cachefly 82.5MB/s Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 765KB/s Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 4.36MB/s Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 7.81MB/s San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 82.4MB/s Washington, DC, US Softlayer 2.35MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 3.66MB/s Singapore Softlayer 212KB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 7.68MB/s Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 7.52MB/s Disk Speed ---------- I/O (1st run) : 75.1 MB/s I/O (2nd run) : 397 MB/s I/O (3rd run) : 362 MB/s Average I/O : 278.033 MB/s

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Time Warner Cable (Los Angeles, CA) [1.30 km]: 5.069 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 336.01 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 165.82 Mbit/s

3. Domestic access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 57.1004 s, 4.7 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Sat Jun 24 2017 10:09:53 - 10:38:02 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 24430601.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3067.8 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 6062.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 793242.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 211411.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2254501.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1558888.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 256022.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 13831.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4951.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 691.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1696753.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 24430601.9 2093.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3067.8 557.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 6062.7 1409.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 793242.4 2003.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 211411.3 1277.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2254501.9 3887.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1558888.5 1253.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 256022.4 640.1 Process Creation 126.0 13831.0 1097.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4951.1 1167.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 691.5 1152.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1696753.4 1131.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1293.5

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 10.0.0.9 to 67.209.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 06/24 22:08:27.976 Ping to 67.209.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/24 22:08:28.784 超時#1 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/24 22:08:29.182 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 67.209.xxx.xxx: time=201ms TTL=50, ave=201.00ms 06/24 22:08:30.185 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 67.209.xxx.xxx: time=206ms TTL=50, ave=203.50ms 06/24 22:08:31.180 PingMin #4 Reply 32 bytes from 67.209.xxx.xxx: time=200ms TTL=50, ave=202.33ms 06/24 22:08:32.189 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 67.209.xxx.xxx: time=211ms TTL=50, ave=204.50ms 06/24 22:08:33.188 PingMax #6 Reply 32 bytes from 67.209.xxx.xxx: time=213ms TTL=50, ave=206.20ms 06/24 22:08:34.190 PingMax #7 Reply 32 bytes from 67.209.xxx.xxx: time=215ms TTL=50, ave=207.67ms 06/24 22:08:36.199 PingMax #9 Reply 32 bytes from 67.209.xxx.xxx: time=220ms TTL=50, ave=209.13ms 06/24 22:08:42.203 PingMax #15 Reply 32 bytes from 67.209.xxx.xxx: time=225ms TTL=50, ave=210.43ms 06/24 22:08:44.784 超時#17 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/24 22:08:47.171 PingMin #20 Reply 32 bytes from 67.209.xxx.xxx: time=196ms TTL=50, ave=209.50ms 06/24 22:08:47.173 === 20 有效發送, 18 接收, 10.00% 丟失, 209.50ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2017/06/24 22:08:27經過時間: 000:00:19結束時間: 2017/06/24 22:08:47 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送18 有效接收2 timed out (10.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值196ms, 最大值225ms, 平均值209.50ms

7. Route tracking <br /> Telecommunications

China Unicom

move