|
Details : Linode: $5/month/1GB memory/20GB SSD space/1TB traffic/KVM/Japan/Singapore. With such a price, configuration and years of stable guarantee, the domestic access speed is very good, the service attitude is good, and the help documents are extremely detailed.
A must for stable website building! ! ! 1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v4 @ 2.30GHz Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 2299.990 MHz Total size of Disk : 20.0 GB (1.2 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 992 MB (531 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 11 min Load average : 0.24, 0.23, 0.10 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.0.2-x86_64-linode56 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 1.1 GB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 1.1 GB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 1.1 GB/s Average I/O speed : 1126.4 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 136MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 15.5MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 5.92MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 13.0MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 13.6MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 2.91MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 111MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 52.3MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 11.7MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 10.1MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 12.3MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv6 address Download Speed Linode, Atlanta, GA 2600:3c02::4b 50.8MB/s Linode, Dallas, TX 2600:3c00::4b 125MB/s Linode, Newark, NJ 2600:3c03::4b 27.2MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 2400:8901::4b 5.90MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 2400:8900::4b 17.2MB/s Softlayer, San Jose, CA 2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4 36.5MB/s Softlayer, Washington, WA 2607:f0d0:3001:78::2 3.08MB/s Softlayer, Paris, FR 2a03:8180:1301:8::4 19.6MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2401:c900:1101:8::2 10.2MB/s Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 2401:c900:1001:16::4 14.2MB/s 2. Upload/download bandwidth test Hosted by TRANSTELCO (Dallas, TX) [1.73 km]: 7.422 ms Testing download speed.................................. Download: 458.78 Mbit/s Testing upload speed.................................... Upload: 405.85 Mbit/s 3. Domestic access speed
4. Hard disk I/O performance test dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.28764 s, 208 MB/s 5. UnixBench Benchmark Run: Thu Jun 15 2017 11:52:12 - 12:20:18 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 27388043.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3310.8 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5204.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 833198.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 223252.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2484268.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1340988.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 282804.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 14496.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5415.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 732.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2021011.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 27388043.5 2346.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3310.8 602.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 5204.4 1210.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 833198.8 2104.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 223252.4 1349.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2484268.7 4283.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1340988.5 1078.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 282804.9 707.0 Process Creation 126.0 14496.0 1150.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5415.4 1277.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 732.5 1220.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2021011.3 1347.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1355.0 6. Packet loss test: Ruisu is not installed Ping from 192.168.1.29 to 173.255.199.212 ============================================================================== 06/15 19:56:18.181 Ping to 173.255.199.212 with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/15 19:56:18.454 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 173.255.199.212: time=270ms TTL=49, ave=270.00ms 06/15 19:56:19.457 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 173.255.199.212: time=274ms TTL=49, ave=272.00ms 06/15 19:56:21.179 超時#3 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/15 19:56:23.179 超時#5 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/15 19:56:24.179 超時#6 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/15 19:56:24.456 PingMax #7 Reply 32 bytes from 173.255.199.212: time=275ms TTL=49, ave=272.75ms 06/15 19:56:27.179 超時#9 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/15 19:56:27.439 PingMin #10 Reply 32 bytes from 173.255.199.212: time=253ms TTL=49, ave=269.67ms 06/15 19:56:28.436 PingMin #11 Reply 32 bytes from 173.255.199.212: time=252ms TTL=49, ave=267.14ms 06/15 19:56:34.179 超時#16 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/15 19:56:35.179 超時#17 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/15 19:56:36.179 超時#18 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/15 19:56:38.179 超時#20 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/15 19:56:38.181 === 20 有效發送, 12 接收, 40.00% 丟失, 267.92ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2017/06/15 19:56:18經過時間: 000:00:20結束時間: 2017/06/15 19:56:38 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送12 有效接收8 timed out (40.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值252ms, 最大值275ms, 平均值267.92ms 7. Route tracking <br />Telecommunications
China Unicom
8. YouTube speed test
|
