Hostdare 1GB RAM KVM VPS Los Angeles Review

Hostdare 1GB RAM KVM VPS Los Angeles Review

hostdare, a very good small business, good products, excellent service attitude, the following is the newly proposed kvm vps review.
Details: HostDare: $32/year/1GB RAM/20GB SSD space/1TB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles/Asia optimization

System information and bandwidth test :

 System Info ----------- Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) CPU Cores : 1 Frequency : 3503.978 MHz Memory : 996 MB Swap : 1023 MB Uptime : 54 min, OS : CentOS release 6.6 (Final) Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 Hostname : test Speedtest (IPv4 only) --------------------- Your public IPv4 is 103.79.xxx.xxx Location Provider Speed CDN Cachefly 81.2MB/s Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 6.79MB/s Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 24.2MB/s Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 22.1MB/s San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 74.0MB/s Washington, DC, US Softlayer 26.2MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 16.8MB/s Singapore Softlayer 8.01MB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 5.66MB/s Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 21.7MB/s Disk Speed ---------- I/O (1st run) : 449 MB/s I/O (2nd run) : 365 MB/s I/O (3rd run) : 384 MB/s Average I/O : 399.333 MB/s

Hard disk I/O performance :

 hdparm -t /dev/vda1 /dev/vda1: Timing buffered disk reads: 2856 MB in 3.00 seconds = 951.67 MB/sec

UnixBench score :

 Benchmark Run: Wed Dec 21 2016 10:02:54 - 10:30:57 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 41577522.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4201.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5558.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1263474.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 356241.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3178078.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2321058.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 484503.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 16499.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7169.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 958.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3401972.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 41577522.6 3562.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4201.9 764.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 5558.2 1292.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1263474.5 3190.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 356241.0 2152.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3178078.1 5479.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2321058.2 1865.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 484503.7 1211.3 Process Creation 126.0 16499.1 1309.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7169.1 1690.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 958.9 1598.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3401972.6 2268.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1913.0

Domestic ping :

Upload/download bandwidth test :

 Testing download speed...................... Download: 505.95 Mbit/s Testing upload speed........................ Upload: 436.88 Mbit/s

Packet loss test :

 Ping from 192.168.1.243 to 103.79.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 01/07 11:42:17.816 Ping to 103.79.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 01/07 11:42:18.017 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=190ms TTL=48, ave=190.00ms 01/07 11:42:19.005 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=189ms TTL=48, ave=189.50ms 01/07 11:42:20.009 PingMax #3 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=191ms TTL=48, ave=190.00ms 01/07 11:42:22.010 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=192ms TTL=48, ave=190.60ms 01/07 11:42:27.026 PingMax #10 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=199ms TTL=48, ave=191.20ms 01/07 11:42:28.010 PingMin #11 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=188ms TTL=48, ave=190.91ms 01/07 11:42:37.013 PingMin #20 Reply 32 bytes from 103.79.xxx.xxx: time=187ms TTL=48, ave=190.30ms 01/07 11:42:37.013 === 20 有效發送, 20 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 190.30ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2017/01/07 11:42:17經過時間: 000:00:19結束時間: 2017/01/07 11:42:37 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送20 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值187ms, 最大值199ms, 平均值190.30ms

<<:  Sentris: $5.75/ 3 years/128MB memory/1GB space/250GB traffic/1IP/OpenVZ/Seattle

>>:  High memory, large capacity OpenVZ VPS collection and recommendation

Recommend

$8.99/year/15G space/200G traffic virtual host - ReverseHosts

ReverseHosts is a German hosting company that was...

[Black Friday] ethernetservers discounts

ethernetservers, a stable merchant, is worth choo...

ABStation: £2.5/month/1GB memory/10GB SSD space/500GB traffic/KVM/UK

ABStation, a British merchant, was established in...

HostHatch: $17/year/512MB memory/250GB space/1TB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles

HostHatch, an old-fashioned hosting provider, has...

psychz: $19/month/4GB RAM/500GB hard drive/30TB traffic/13 IPs/Los Angeles

psychz has its own data center and many hosts use...

TechVPS: $12/year/512MB memory/10GB space/1TB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles/New York

TechVPS has been resurrected and added VPS in Los...

OneVPS 512MB RAM 1Gbps Bandwidth Japan KVM VPS Review

Details: OneVPS: $3.75/month/512MB RAM/20GB SSD s...

MoonVM: $18/month/1GB RAM/25GB SSD space/4TB bandwidth/KVM/Portland NCP

MoonVM previously only provided Taiwan Hinet KVM ...

IonSwitch: $22.5/year/512MB memory/5GB NVMe SSD space/500GB traffic/KVM/Seattle

IonSwitch, a hosting provider established in Febr...

VolumeDrive: $4.95/month/1GB memory/50GB space/16TB traffic/2 IP/KVM/New York

VolumeDrive, an American hosting company, was fou...