cbvps 4GB RAM Miami EnZu OpenVZ VPS Review

cbvps 4GB RAM Miami EnZu OpenVZ VPS Review

Details: cbvps: 22 yuan/month/4GB memory/20GB space/3TB traffic/OpenVZ/Miami EnZu
The 50% discount on the revolving plan is quite good, and the monthly payment is only HK$13.4. The configuration is powerful, the bandwidth is 100M, and the memory is large, which is good.
Welcome to the TeleGram group discussion : https://t.me/zhujiwiki

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz CPU Cores : 4 Cores @ 3500.068 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 8192 KB OS : CentOS 7.5.1804 (64 Bit) OpenVZ Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab130.1 Total Space : 20.0 GB (0.6 GB Used) Total RAM : 4096 MB (15 MB Used 545 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 0 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime : 0 days 0 hour 7 min Load average : 0.22, 0.31, 0.13 ASN & ISP : AS18978, Enzu Organization : Enzu Location : Miami, United States / US Region : Florida ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 112 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 113 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 114 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 113.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 92.07 Mbit/s 93.71 Mbit/s 2.744 ms Shanghai CT 15.68 Mbit/s 25.67 Mbit/s 461.25 ms Kunming CT 19.91 Mbit/s 27.42 Mbit/s 000.000 ms Shanghai CU 8.79 Mbit/s 24.06 Mbit/s 255.278 ms Xi'an CU 15.28 Mbit/s 26.52 Mbit/s 443.267 ms Chongqing CU 22.77 Mbit/s 48.78 Mbit/s 379.6 ms Xi'an CM 19.49 Mbit/s 26.60 Mbit/s 524.279 ms Chengdu CM 13.26 Mbit/s 17.10 Mbit/s 330.502 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 5 min 3 sec Timestamp : 2018-07-11 08:11:50 GMT+8

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by UPX Technologies (Miami, FL) [2.29 km]: 1.821 ms Testing download speed......................... Download: 93.70 Mbit/s Testing upload speed........................... Upload: 93.67 Mbit/s

3. Domestic access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 122.078 s, 2.2 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 11 2018 00:33:47 - 01:02:12 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 40170304.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3971.6 MWIPS (12.4 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3981.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 548710.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 142678.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1718149.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 848886.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 163433.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 12983.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8410.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2583.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 755087.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 40170304.6 3442.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3971.6 722.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 3981.9 926.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 548710.0 1385.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 142678.3 862.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1718149.2 2962.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 848886.1 682.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 163433.6 408.6 Process Creation 126.0 12983.3 1030.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8410.0 1983.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2583.1 4305.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 755087.2 503.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1212.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Wed Jul 11 2018 01:02:12 - 01:30:38 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 158343591.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 16688.9 MWIPS (11.5 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 17877.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1014468.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 264660.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3161232.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 3314972.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 652943.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 35482.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 21563.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2847.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2695297.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 158343591.5 13568.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 16688.9 3034.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 17877.6 4157.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1014468.2 2561.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 264660.5 1599.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3161232.1 5450.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3314972.1 2664.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 652943.9 1632.4 Process Creation 126.0 35482.3 2816.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 21563.7 5085.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2847.8 4746.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2695297.4 1796.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 3354.6

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 107.183.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 07/11 08:16:50.692 Ping to 107.183.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 07/11 08:16:51.076 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 107.183.xxx.xxx: time=275ms TTL=48, ave=275.00ms 07/11 08:16:51.945 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 107.183.xxx.xxx: time=253ms TTL=48, ave=264.00ms 07/11 08:17:10.981 PingMax #21 Reply 32 bytes from 107.183.xxx.xxx: time=285ms TTL=48, ave=256.76ms 07/11 08:17:13.017 PingMax #23 Reply 32 bytes from 107.183.xxx.xxx: time=321ms TTL=48, ave=259.39ms 07/11 08:17:23.945 PingMin #34 Reply 32 bytes from 107.183.xxx.xxx: time=252ms TTL=48, ave=259.62ms 07/11 08:18:29.985 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 259.05ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/07/11 08:16:50經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/07/11 08:18:29 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值252ms, 最大值321ms, 平均值259.05ms

7. Route tracking <br /> Telecommunications

China Unicom

move

8. YouTube speed test

<<:  cbvps: Hong Kong HK3 restocking, Miami VPS 50% discount, NAT domain name binding function launched

>>:  MycoRin 256MB RAM Hong Kong NAT KVM VPS Review

Recommend

GoodHosting: $10.5/year/256MB RAM/5GB SSD/1 IPv4/Unlimited traffic/KVM

GoodHosting.co was established not long ago. It m...

Sentris: $25/year/2GB memory/60GB space/1TB traffic/4 IP/KVM/Seattle

Sentris, launched a new offer. Free licensed vers...

Ramnode: $8/year/128MB memory/12GB SSD/500GB traffic/1 IP/OpenVZ

Ramnode, which has been introduced many times by ...

KamHost: $49/month/L5520/24GB memory/960GB SSD hard drive/10TB traffic/New York

KamHost, an American hosting provider, was establ...

INIZ: £3/month/512MB RAM/512GB storage/2TB bandwidth/OpenVZ/Dallas

INIZ, a formally registered company in the UK, ha...

QuickPacket: $30/month/8GB memory/1TB hard drive/20TB traffic/5IP/Los Angeles

QuickPacket, which has been introduced many times...

WebHi: $2.4/month/1GB memory/60GB space/500GB traffic/KVM/DDOS protection/Europe

WebHi, a European hosting provider, provides host...

FAPVPS: $15/year/1 CPU/256M/5G/120G/KVM

FAPVPS是一家美國主機商,其宣稱提供快速、穩定、專業的VPS,成立時間似乎不長,有一款KVM ...

Cloudxtiny: £1.5/month/512MB memory/5GB space/100GB bandwidth/1Gbps port/KVM/UK

Cloudxtiny, a long-established British business, ...

Millenial.Host 512MB RAM 100Mbps Bandwidth Hong Kong KVM VPS Review

Details : Millenial.Host: $3/month/512MB memory/1...