|
Details : Nathosts: 50 yuan/month/512MB memory/9GB SSD space/1.5TB traffic/100Mbps/KVM/Hong Kong HKBN
The network is good, and the official ports 80 and 443 have been opened, so you can build a website and do other things.
Welcome to the TeleGram group discussion: https://t.me/zhujiwiki 1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) CPU Cores : 1 Cores @ 2593.748 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 4096 KB OS : CentOS 7.4.1708 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel : 4.9.75-29.el7.x86_64 Total Space : 8.6 GB (1.3 GB Used) Total RAM : 486 MB (50 MB Used 111 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 255 MB (0 MB Used) Uptime : 0 days 0 hour 7 min Load average : 0.00, 0.02, 0.00 ASN & ISP : AS9269, Hong Kong Broadband Network Organization : Hong Kong Broadband Network Location : Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong / HK Region : Tsuen Wan District ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 307 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 387 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 385 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 359.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 98.78 Mbit/s 195.58 Mbit/s 17.001 ms Shanghai CT 96.65 Mbit/s 181.90 Mbit/s 52.605 ms Kunming CT 95.22 Mbit/s 161.70 Mbit/s 000.000 ms Chengdu CT 97.47 Mbit/s 167.80 Mbit/s 42.378 ms Shanghai CU 86.44 Mbit/s 164.14 Mbit/s 48.503 ms Xi'an CU 86.33 Mbit/s 74.91 Mbit/s 64.173 ms Chongqing CU 82.05 Mbit/s 178.58 Mbit/s 875.311 ms Xi'an CM 78.43 Mbit/s 166.55 Mbit/s 107.104 ms Chengdu CM 92.16 Mbit/s 66.92 Mbit/s 64.59 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished in : 4 min 4 sec Timestamp : 2018-07-09 11:25:25 GMT+8
2. Upload/download bandwidth test Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by HGC Global Communications Limited (Shatin) [10.08 km]: 20.41 ms Testing download speed.................................. Download: 140.48 Mbit/s Testing upload speed.................................... Upload: 98.61 Mbit/s 3. Domestic access speed
4. Hard disk I/O performance test dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 11.4357 s, 23.5 MB/s 5. UnixBench Benchmark Run: Sun Jul 08 2018 23:39:20 - 00:07:33 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26977267.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3329.1 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2625.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 247923.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 71351.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 768698.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 374519.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 109187.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6350.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3275.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 431.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 289454.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26977267.8 2311.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3329.1 605.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 2625.5 610.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 247923.2 626.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 71351.9 431.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 768698.4 1325.3 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 374519.0 301.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109187.0 273.0 Process Creation 126.0 6350.1 504.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3275.3 772.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 431.1 718.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 289454.7 193.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 576.8 6. Packet loss test Ping from 192.168.0.29 to 183.179.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 07/09 11:31:13.336 Ping to 183.179.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 07/09 11:31:13.432 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=86ms TTL=47, ave=86.00ms 07/09 11:31:14.421 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=85ms TTL=47, ave=85.50ms 07/09 11:31:15.420 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=84ms TTL=47, ave=85.00ms 07/09 11:31:16.418 PingMin #4 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=83ms TTL=47, ave=84.50ms 07/09 11:31:17.422 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=87ms TTL=47, ave=85.00ms 07/09 11:31:18.416 PingMin #6 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=79ms TTL=47, ave=84.00ms 07/09 11:31:21.451 PingMax #9 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=112ms TTL=47, ave=87.00ms 07/09 11:31:25.452 PingMax #13 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=116ms TTL=47, ave=88.62ms 07/09 11:31:29.451 PingMax #17 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=117ms TTL=47, ave=89.24ms 07/09 11:32:09.456 PingMax #57 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=120ms TTL=47, ave=89.19ms 07/09 11:32:13.462 PingMax #61 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=122ms TTL=47, ave=89.46ms 07/09 11:32:34.524 PingMax #82 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=188ms TTL=47, ave=89.63ms 07/09 11:32:36.626 TooLate #84 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=287ms TTL=47, ave=91.90ms 07/09 11:32:37.871 TooLate #85 Reply 32 bytes from 183.179.xxx.xxx: time=532ms TTL=47, ave=97.08ms 07/09 11:32:52.452 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 95.87ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/07/09 11:31:13經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/07/09 11:32:52 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值79ms, 最大值532ms, 平均值95.87ms 7. Route tracking <br /> Telecommunications
China Unicom
move
8. YouTube speed test
|
