HostDare 756MB RAM Los Angeles CN2 KVM VPS Review

HostDare 756MB RAM Los Angeles CN2 KVM VPS Review

Details: HostDare: $4.99/month/756MB memory/17GB space/1TB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles CN2
The performance is very good, the I/O is awesome, the network is very good, it is worth having!
Welcome to the TeleGram group discussion: https://t.me/zhujiwiki

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 2999.998 MHz Total size of Disk : 16.0 GB (1.0 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 740 MB (54 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 766 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 9 hour 12 min Load average : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05 OS : CentOS 7.3.1611 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 105 MB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 105 MB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 105 MB/s Average I/O speed : 105.0 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 9.12MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 8.30MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 6.85MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 5.68MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 6.38MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 9.10MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 8.68MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 8.92MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 7.31MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 6.68MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 7.14MB/s

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Interoute VDC (Los Angeles, CA) [0.74 km]: 2.684 ms Testing download speed............................... Download: 76.35 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................. Upload: 73.55 Mbit/s

3. Domestic access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.26371 s, 82.2 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Sun Jul 01 2018 21:04:48 - 21:32:58 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 33538302.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4833.4 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4649.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1013846.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 275491.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3115121.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1606602.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 350958.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 15581.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6421.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 858.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2451892.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 33538302.9 2873.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4833.4 878.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 4649.2 1081.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1013846.1 2560.2 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 275491.1 1664.6 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3115121.1 5370.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1606602.2 1291.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 350958.7 877.4 Process Creation 126.0 15581.9 1236.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6421.6 1514.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 858.3 1430.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2451892.1 1634.6 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1613.0

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 10.0.0.20 to 202.91.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 07/02 08:57:22.792 Ping to 202.91.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 07/02 08:57:22.964 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 202.91.xxx.xxx: time=163ms TTL=52, ave=163.00ms 07/02 08:57:23.964 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 202.91.xxx.xxx: time=161ms TTL=52, ave=162.00ms 07/02 08:57:44.969 PingMax #23 Reply 32 bytes from 202.91.xxx.xxx: time=166ms TTL=52, ave=161.96ms 07/02 08:57:53.969 PingMin #32 Reply 32 bytes from 202.91.xxx.xxx: time=160ms TTL=52, ave=161.88ms 07/02 08:59:01.972 === 100 有效發送, 100 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 161.56ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/07/02 08:57:22經過時間: 000:01:39結束時間: 2018/07/02 08:59:01 ---------------- 100 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 100 有效發送100 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值160ms, 最大值166ms, 平均值161.56ms

7. Route tracking <br /> Telecommunications

China Unicom

move

8. YouTube speed test

<<:  HostDare: $4.99/month/756MB memory/17GB space/1TB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles CN2

>>:  Zare: £30/month/E3-1231v3/16GB RAM/240GB SSD/20TB bandwidth/DDoS/UK

Recommend

WordPress uses Redis to speed up caching

1. Redis configuration, installation, etc. 1. Red...

MICRONET VPS: $7.25/month/1GB RAM/20GB storage/100GB traffic/1 IP/India

MicroNet was founded in 2009, entered the UK mark...

Building a blog using Google App Engine

The stability and speed of Google App Engine are ...

Webtropia: €35/month/i7-4790k/32GB memory/2TB space/unlimited traffic/Germany

Webtropia, owned by myLoc, now has 3 new standalo...

How to maximize ad visibility and response

5.1 Ad placement: where do you put them? Location...

ZXhost: £31/year/2GB RAM/1TB storage/unlimited bandwidth/OpenVZ/Canada

ZXhost, a British hosting provider, was establish...

$7/month/256M/20G space/400G traffic VPS —— lightwave

Lightwave is an American ISP founded in 1998. It ...