Websound 256MB RAM Los Angeles Sharktech KVM VPS Review

Details: Websound: $18/year/256MB memory/15GB space/1TB bandwidth/KVM/Sharktech, Los Angeles
The performance is poor, refunds can only be made to the remaining balance, the price is slightly high, and it is not recommended to buy!

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 2599.998 MHz Total size of Disk : 15.0 GB (1.1 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 236 MB (66 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 0 hour 17 min Load average : 0.03, 0.07, 0.05 OS : CentOS 7.3.1611 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.10.0-514.el7.x86_64 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 486 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 594 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 406 MB/s Average I/O speed : 495.3 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 224.99 Mbit/s 65.67 ms Shanghai CT 40.95 Mbit/s 159.426 ms Chengdu CT 28.13 Mbit/s 219.606 ms Shanghai CU 51.85 Mbit/s 179.553 ms Chongqing CU 34.55 Mbit/s 184.305 ms Xi'an CM 100.77 Mbit/s 205.416 ms Chengdu CM 43.96 Mbit/s 225.462 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 1 min 57 sec Current time : 2018-02-23 07:55:26 Finished！

2. Upload/download bandwidth test <br /> Directly killed

3. Domestic access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 15.0778 s, 17.8 MB/s

5. UnixBench benchmark <br /> Bench benchmarking. . .

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 192.168.43.94 to 64.32.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 02/23 20:54:07.509 Ping to 64.32.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 02/23 20:54:07.843 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 64.32.xxx.xxx: time=332ms TTL=46, ave=332.00ms 02/23 20:54:08.830 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 64.32.xxx.xxx: time=325ms TTL=46, ave=328.50ms 02/23 20:54:09.776 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 64.32.xxx.xxx: time=268ms TTL=46, ave=308.33ms 02/23 20:54:11.327 PingMax #4 Reply 32 bytes from 64.32.xxx.xxx: time=817ms TTL=46, ave=435.50ms 02/23 20:54:24.503 超時#17 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 02/23 20:54:25.504 超時#18 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 02/23 20:54:26.504 超時#19 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 02/23 20:54:27.503 超時#20 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 02/23 20:54:27.504 === 20 有效發送, 16 接收, 20.00% 丟失, 388.81ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/02/23 20:54:07經過時間: 000:00:20結束時間: 2018/02/23 20:54:27 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送16 有效接收4 timed out (20.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值268ms, 最大值817ms, 平均值388.81ms

7. Route tracking <br /> Telecommunications

China Unicom

move

8. Youtube speed test <br /> Later. . .