Xeovo 512MB RAM OpenVZ VPS Singapore Review

xeovo, there have been rumors that it is going to run away, but it is still there. The following is a review of an ovz vps in Singapore.
The network is very good.
How to buy : Follow xeovo official twitter and use the bidding mode.
There are still stocks in Singapore now: https://www.xeovo.com/SingaporePromo

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2673 v3 @ 2.40GHz Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 2397.221 MHz Total size of Disk : 9.8 GB (2.3 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 512 MB (414 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 5 hour 45 min Load average : 0.02, 0.05, 0.01 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab123.3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 997 MB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 1.0 GB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 1.1 GB/s Average I/O speed : 1049.1 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 134MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 29.7MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 167MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 9.67MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 3.45MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 3.21MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 9.67MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 12.2MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 1.06MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 96.8MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 57.2MB/s

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

 Hosted by NewMedia Express (Singapore) [6.48 km]: 2.052 ms Testing download speed......................... Download: 3528.68 Mbit/s Testing upload speed........................... Upload: 1118.08 Mbit/s

3. Domestic access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 20.6742 s, 13.0 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 19 2017 04:52:26 - 05:20:49 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 30130033.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3153.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 3341.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 705039.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 193140.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2132136.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1419431.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 268699.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 12289.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4754.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 642.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2263919.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 30130033.5 2581.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3153.6 573.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 3341.1 777.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 705039.6 1780.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 193140.4 1167.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2132136.9 3676.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1419431.6 1141.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 268699.9 671.7 Process Creation 126.0 12289.3 975.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4754.3 1121.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 642.6 1071.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2263919.3 1509.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1229.3

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 192.168.16.243 to 13.76.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 06/19 16:51:48.895 Ping to 13.76.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/19 16:51:49.027 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 13.76.xxx.xxx: time=130ms TTL=47, ave=130.00ms 06/19 16:51:51.017 PingMin #3 Reply 32 bytes from 13.76.xxx.xxx: time=129ms TTL=47, ave=129.67ms 06/19 16:51:52.010 PingMin #4 Reply 32 bytes from 13.76.xxx.xxx: time=123ms TTL=47, ave=128.00ms 06/19 16:51:52.997 PingMin #5 Reply 32 bytes from 13.76.xxx.xxx: time=112ms TTL=47, ave=124.80ms 06/19 16:51:53.986 PingMin #6 Reply 32 bytes from 13.76.xxx.xxx: time=102ms TTL=47, ave=121.00ms 06/19 16:51:54.969 PingMin #7 Reply 32 bytes from 13.76.xxx.xxx: time=83ms TTL=47, ave=115.57ms 06/19 16:51:55.968 PingMin #8 Reply 32 bytes from 13.76.xxx.xxx: time=79ms TTL=47, ave=111.00ms 06/19 16:51:56.963 PingMin #9 Reply 32 bytes from 13.76.xxx.xxx: time=76ms TTL=47, ave=107.11ms 06/19 16:52:08.020 === 20 有效發送, 20 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 113.40ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2017/06/19 16:51:48經過時間: 000:00:19結束時間: 2017/06/19 16:52:08 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送20 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值76ms, 最大值130ms, 平均值113.40ms

7. YouTube test