BandwagonHost 512MB RAM Los Angeles MCOM KVM VPS Review

BandwagonHost 512MB RAM Los Angeles MCOM KVM VPS Review

Details: BandwagonHost: $19.99/year/512MB memory/10GB SSD space/500GB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles, data center can be changed.
Or BandwagonHost: $19.99/year/512MB memory/10GB SSD space/1TB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles, the data center cannot be changed, but the traffic is doubled and the price is lowered.

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 System Info ----------- Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) CPU Cores : 1 Frequency : 2199.996 MHz Memory : 507 MB Swap : 0 MB Uptime : 26 min, OS : CentOS release 6.9 (Final) Arch : i686 (32 Bit) Kernel : 4.10.4-1.el6.elrepo.i686 Hostname : localhost.localdomain Speedtest (IPv4 only) --------------------- Your public IPv4 is 98.142.xxx.xxx Location Provider Speed CDN Cachefly 77.6MB/s Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 22.9MB/s Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 40.7MB/s Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 45.1MB/s San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 89.5MB/s Washington, DC, US Softlayer 11.9MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 15.2MB/s Singapore Softlayer 6.45MB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 7.62MB/s Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 18.1MB/s Disk Speed ---------- I/O (1st run) : 531 MB/s I/O (2nd run) : 452 MB/s I/O (3rd run) : 638 MB/s Average I/O : 540.333 MB/s

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

 Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by Tekify Broadband Internet Services (Fremont, CA) [2.34 km]: 9.967 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 379.98 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 495.90 Mbit/s

3. Domestic access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.80975 s, 70.5 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Sat Jun 24 2017 06:49:07 - 07:16:59 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19980320.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2247.9 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4936.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 741059.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 197656.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1608476.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1222433.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 245177.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 11907.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4379.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 568.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1473423.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19980320.3 1712.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2247.9 408.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 4936.1 1147.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 741059.1 1871.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 197656.7 1194.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1608476.5 2773.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1222433.2 982.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 245177.4 612.9 Process Creation 126.0 11907.5 945.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4379.2 1032.8 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 568.3 947.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1473423.5 982.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1087.1

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 10.0.0.9 to 98.142.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 06/24 18:49:37.120 Ping to 98.142.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/24 18:49:37.296 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 98.142.xxx.xxx: time=173ms TTL=52, ave=173.00ms 06/24 18:49:38.298 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 98.142.xxx.xxx: time=183ms TTL=52, ave=178.00ms 06/24 18:49:52.399 PingMax #16 Reply 32 bytes from 98.142.xxx.xxx: time=281ms TTL=52, ave=182.00ms 06/24 18:49:53.784 超時#17 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/24 18:49:54.400 PingMax #18 Reply 32 bytes from 98.142.xxx.xxx: time=285ms TTL=52, ave=188.06ms 06/24 18:49:55.784 超時#19 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 06/24 18:49:56.401 === 20 有效發送, 18 接收, 10.00% 丟失, 193.39ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2017/06/24 18:49:37經過時間: 000:00:19結束時間: 2017/06/24 18:49:56 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送18 有效接收2 timed out (10.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值173ms, 最大值285ms, 平均值193.39ms

7. Route tracking <br /> Telecommunications

China Unicom

move

<<:  LimeISP: $3.99/month/1GB memory/150GB space/1TB traffic/KVM/Germany

>>:  Cloudflexy 1GB RAM Los Angeles OpenVZ VPS Review

Recommend

WordPress uses Redis to speed up caching

1. Redis configuration, installation, etc. 1. Red...

AgileRack: $5/month/8 cores/512M/50G/2T/1 IP/OpenVZ

AgileRack is an American hosting company. It was ...

$4.95/month/5G space/100G traffic/support Alipay: Sugarhosts

Introduction to Sugarhosts Sugarhosts is a Britis...

WebHATS: $9.99/month/1 core/2GB memory/50GB/500GB/4 IP/OpenVZ

WebHATS is an American hosting company founded in...

$5/month/50G space/750G traffic virtual host——Shiro Host

Shiro Host is a Canadian hosting company founded ...

NodeServ: $35/year/768MB/35GB hard disk/2TB traffic/KVM

NodeServ, an American hosting company, was founde...

Vultr Free $25 Bonus

The discount information is as follows: MATCH25: ...

drserver: $20/year/512MB memory/100GB space/512GB bandwidth/Xen/Dallas

drserver, a stable merchant. This time, we have a...

Nura Host: $10/year/1GB RAM/50GB storage/1.5TB bandwidth/OpenVZ

Nura Host, a US hosting provider, seems to be a n...

GreenCloudVPS: $33.6/year/1GB memory/200GB space/1.5TB traffic/KVM/Los Angeles

GreenCloudVPS, a hosting provider founded in 2013...