LizCat 1GB RAM KVM VPS San Jose Review

Details : LizCat: $12/year/512MB memory/5GB space/1TB traffic/KVM/San Jose From the test, the network is quite good, the performance is also average, combined with the price, the cost performance is very high! Then we need to look at stability.

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 CPU model : Westmere E56xx/L56xx/X56xx (Nehalem-C) Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 2400.084 MHz Total size of Disk : 8.9 GB (1.1 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 996 MB (525 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 13 min Load average : 0.48, 0.36, 0.14 OS : CentOS 6.9 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 2.6.32-504.23.4.el6.x86_64 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed(1st run) : 204 MB/s I/O speed(2nd run) : 199 MB/s I/O speed(3rd run) : 211 MB/s Average I/O speed : 204.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed CacheFly 205.234.175.175 69.6MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 21.5MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 1.50MB/s Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 2.15MB/s Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 3.04MB/s Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 33.6MB/s Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 9.97MB/s Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 18.7MB/s Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 1.68MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 1.99MB/s Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 1.61MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name IPv6 address Download Speed Linode, Atlanta, GA 2600:3c02::4b 3.83MB/s Linode, Dallas, TX 2600:3c00::4b 20.6MB/s Linode, Newark, NJ 2600:3c03::4b 6.92MB/s Linode, Singapore, SG 2400:8901::4b 4.02MB/s Linode, Tokyo, JP 2400:8900::4b 15.5MB/s Softlayer, San Jose, CA 2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4 13.2MB/s Softlayer, Washington, WA 2607:f0d0:3001:78::2 2.97MB/s Softlayer, Paris, FR 2a03:8180:1301:8::4 6.62MB/s Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2401:c900:1101:8::2 2.61MB/s Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 2401:c900:1001:16::4 13.0MB/s

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

 python speedtest.py Retrieving speedtest.net configuration... Testing from LizCat (Shanghai) Limited (103.76.105.156)... Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by DNASOLES (San Jose, CA) [4.20 km]: 9.215 ms Testing download speed..................................... Download: 403.44 Mbit/s Testing upload speed....................................... Upload: 101.37 Mbit/s

3. Domestic access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.70463 s, 72.5 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Mon Jun 12 2017 07:35:50 - 08:04:04 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 22085071.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2793.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2494.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 529471.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 152433.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1258106.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1092809.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 204139.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 7052.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3376.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 454.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 1581348.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 22085071.8 1892.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2793.7 507.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 2494.1 580.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 529471.4 1337.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 152433.0 921.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1258106.1 2169.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1092809.4 878.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 204139.4 510.3 Process Creation 126.0 7052.6 559.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3376.8 796.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 454.9 758.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1581348.7 1054.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 887.2

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 192.168.1.29 to 103.76.105.156 ============================================================================== 06/12 20:12:29.206 Ping to 103.76.105.156 with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 06/12 20:12:29.417 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 103.76.105.156: time=205ms TTL=52, ave=205.00ms 06/12 20:12:30.418 PingMax #2 Reply 32 bytes from 103.76.105.156: time=206ms TTL=52, ave=205.50ms 06/12 20:12:33.421 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 103.76.105.156: time=208ms TTL=52, ave=206.20ms 06/12 20:12:48.418 PingMax #20 Reply 32 bytes from 103.76.105.156: time=210ms TTL=52, ave=205.75ms 06/12 20:12:48.419 === 20 有效發送, 20 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 205.75ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2017/06/12 20:12:29經過時間: 000:00:19結束時間: 2017/06/12 20:12:48 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送20 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值205ms, 最大值210ms, 平均值205.75ms

7. Route tracking <br />Telecommunications:

China Unicom:

8. YouTube test