Hostodo 256MB RAM KVM VPS Los Angeles Review

Hostodo, 8th anniversary KVM VPS 30% off discount, high cost performance. But the previous OpenVZ VPS was indeed seriously oversold and could only be used for circumvention and backup. Here is a brief review of kvm vps:

System Information :
CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
Number of cores: 1
CPU frequency : 2099.998 MHz
Total amount of ram : 248 MB
Total amount of swap : 255 MB
System uptime: 1 min,
Download speed: (32.4MB/s)
I/O speed: 130MB/s

Server I/O performance :
dd bs=64k count=4k if=/dev/zero of=test oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 13.6921 s, 19.6 MB/s

Domestic ping :

Bandwidth test :

 Location Provider Speed CDN Cachefly 37.9MB/s Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 2.15MB/s Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 3.77MB/s Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 4.37MB/s San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 9.95MB/s Washington, DC, US Softlayer 1.88MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 1.02MB/s Singapore Softlayer 614KB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 498KB/s Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 5.77MB/s Disk Speed ---------- I/O (1st run) : 57.0 MB/s I/O (2nd run) : 80.8 MB/s I/O (3rd run) : 70.7 MB/s Average I/O : 69.5 MB/s

UnixBench score :

Packet loss test : Ruisu is not installed, and packet loss is serious

 08/05 21:14:17.151 Ping to 155.94.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 08/05 21:14:17.473 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.230.167: time=326ms TTL=52, ave=326.00ms 08/05 21:14:21.082 超時#4 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:21.470 PingMin #5 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.230.167: time=321ms TTL=52, ave=324.75ms 08/05 21:14:23.097 超時#6 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:24.471 PingMin #8 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.230.167: time=318ms TTL=52, ave=323.67ms 08/05 21:14:27.089 超時#10 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:28.083 超時#11 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:29.083 超時#12 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:30.085 超時#13 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:31.089 超時#14 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:32.089 超時#15 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:34.091 超時#17 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:35.086 超時#18 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:38.082 超時#21 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:39.470 PingMax #23 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.230.167: time=327ms TTL=52, ave=323.67ms 08/05 21:14:41.090 超時#24 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:42.082 超時#25 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:14:42.082 === 25 有效發送, 12 接收, 52.00% 丟失, 323.67ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2016/08/05 21:14:17經過時間: 000:00:24結束時間: 2016/08/05 21:14:42 ---------------- 25 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 25 有效發送12 有效接收13 timed out (52.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值318ms, 最大值327ms, 平均值323.67ms

Packet loss test : After installing Ruisu, there is still packet loss

 08/05 21:22:17.704 Ping to 155.94.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 08/05 21:22:18.585 超時#1 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:22:19.023 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.230.167: time=324ms TTL=52, ave=324.00ms 08/05 21:22:20.583 超時#3 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:22:21.589 超時#4 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:22:22.000 PingMin #5 Reply 32 bytes from 155.94.230.167: time=304ms TTL=52, ave=314.00ms 08/05 21:22:30.583 超時#13 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:22:35.597 超時#18 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:22:42.582 超時#25 *****(32 bytes) 請求超時。 08/05 21:22:42.584 === 25 有效發送, 19 接收, 24.00% 丟失, 317.95ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2016/08/05 21:22:17經過時間: 000:00:24結束時間: 2016/08/05 21:22:42 ---------------- 25 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 25 有效發送19 有效接收6 timed out (24.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值304ms, 最大值324ms, 平均值317.95ms