Uovz 512MB RAM Hong Kong CN2 KVM VPS Review

Details : Uovz: 19 yuan/month/512MB memory/10GB space/50GB traffic/KVM/Hong Kong CN2
Judging from the test results, it is much better than his OVZ VPS. The network speed in China is very good, the bandwidth is sufficient, the price is not high, and the stability remains to be seen.
Worth holding!

1. System information, bandwidth, I/O test

 CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) Number of cores : 1 CPU frequency : 2699.998 MHz Total size of Disk : 4.5 GB (0.9 GB Used) Total amount of Mem : 494 MB (280 MB Used) Total amount of Swap : 511 MB (0 MB Used) System uptime : 0 days 11 hour 40 min Load average : 0.16, 0.04, 0.01 OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.16.0-4-amd64 Virt : kvm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I/O speed( 32M ) : 122 MB/s I/O speed( 256M ) : 72.1 MB/s I/O speed( 2G ) : 225 MB/s Average I/O speed : 139.7 MB/s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Normal Node 3.32 Mbit/s 6.95 Mbit/s 580.161 ms Shanghai CT 9.33 Mbit/s 19.25 Mbit/s 92.441 ms Chengdu CT 6.31 Mbit/s 20.24 Mbit/s 54.49 ms Xi'an CU 10.84 Mbit/s 19.76 Mbit/s 89.077 ms Shanghai CU 11.50 Mbit/s 19.90 Mbit/s 45.471 ms Chongqing CU 11.02 Mbit/s 20.22 Mbit/s 47.523 ms Xi'an CM 10.90 Mbit/s 20.30 Mbit/s 32.964 ms Chengdu CM 10.45 Mbit/s 19.45 Mbit/s 48.68 ms ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Total time : 4 min 26 sec Current time : 2018-02-28 21:50:58 Finished！

2. Upload/download bandwidth test

 Retrieving speedtest.net server list... Selecting best server based on ping... Hosted by ITTX Telecoms (Pretoria) [3.83 km]: 510.975 ms Testing download speed................................................................................ Download: 6.84 Mbit/s Testing upload speed................................................................................................ Upload: 5.32 Mbit/s

3. Domestic access speed

4. Hard disk I/O performance test

 dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 7.3901 s, 36.3 MB/s

5. UnixBench

 Benchmark Run: Wed Feb 28 2018 22:04:41 - 22:32:11 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 33949377.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4041.1 MWIPS (7.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 6074.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1232393.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 355783.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2544812.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2179348.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 437109.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 15691.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9884.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1300.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4608432.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 33949377.5 2909.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4041.1 734.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 6074.0 1412.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1232393.1 3112.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 355783.9 2149.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2544812.7 4387.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2179348.2 1751.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 437109.9 1092.8 Process Creation 126.0 15691.7 1245.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9884.6 2331.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1300.2 2166.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4608432.7 3072.3 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1963.3

6. Packet loss test

 Ping from 10.0.0.9 to 160.124.xxx.xxx ============================================================================== 02/28 21:52:57.072 Ping to 160.124.xxx.xxx with 32 bytes of data and 32 of TTL: 02/28 21:52:57.134 PingMin #1 Reply 32 bytes from 160.124.xxx.xxx: time=57ms TTL=49, ave=57.00ms 02/28 21:52:58.119 PingMin #2 Reply 32 bytes from 160.124.xxx.xxx: time=55ms TTL=49, ave=56.00ms 02/28 21:53:01.119 PingMax #5 Reply 32 bytes from 160.124.xxx.xxx: time=59ms TTL=49, ave=56.80ms 02/28 21:53:03.117 PingMax #7 Reply 32 bytes from 160.124.xxx.xxx: time=60ms TTL=49, ave=57.00ms 02/28 21:53:04.133 PingMax #8 Reply 32 bytes from 160.124.xxx.xxx: time=70ms TTL=49, ave=58.63ms 02/28 21:53:07.111 PingMin #11 Reply 32 bytes from 160.124.xxx.xxx: time=54ms TTL=49, ave=57.64ms 02/28 21:53:15.103 PingMin #19 Reply 32 bytes from 160.124.xxx.xxx: time=52ms TTL=49, ave=57.37ms 02/28 21:53:16.125 === 20 有效發送, 20 接收, 0.00% 丟失, 57.20ms 平均值=== --- 結果& 統計信息------------------------------------------------------開始時間: 2018/02/28 21:52:57經過時間: 000:00:19結束時間: 2018/02/28 21:53:16 ---------------- 20 總計發送0 無效接收(除了超時的其它錯誤) ---------------- 20 有效發送20 有效接收0 timed out (0.00% 丟失) Ping 最小值52ms, 最大值70ms, 平均值57.20ms

7. Route tracking <br />Telecommunications

China Unicom

move

8. YouTube speed test